data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/788ad/788ad04f92bb6da98d565b86e11a43269cfdca7b" alt=""
I hesitate to call this a pregnant 'woman' because the exposure of this body, stripped of its skin and visualised is not a 'woman'. This 'woman' is completely disembodied strangely reminiscent of the ways in which reproductive technology has opened up the once hidden recesses of a woman's uterus for biomedicine. Whereas pregnancy was only evident through quickening and known only to the woman herself, today we live in a world that is endlessly visualisable. Fetuses can be 'seen' only a few weeks into a pregnancy and treated surgically inside the womb before they are even born. This sculpture is confronting to say the least and a significant challenge to the fantasy world of celebrity pregnancy where the pregnant body is treated as a sexual object. Here, Hirst strongly connects with early anatomical visions of the pregnant body, most of which represented only a torso and exposed uterus, with no reference to the woman herself.
Curious title. Quite obviously there are religious undertones here. Perhaps a reference to increasing technologising/bioengineering of 'life'. Is IVF is the new immaculate conception?
No comments:
Post a Comment