This is outrageous. We have definitely gone to the bad place if it is now appropriate 1) to make 3 year old children the subject of tabloids and 2) to attack 3 year old children publicly who have no means of understanding or responding to the things that are being written about them. If anything we should all be applauding Shiloh for her desire to look different than most girls her age (*cough* *cough* Suri Cruise)."Shiloh is pushing the boundaries of a tomboy look and crossing over to cross-dresser territory," Alana Kelen, senior fashion stylist at VH1, tells Life & Style. Celebrity stylist Gili Rashal-Niv agrees. "I get that times are tough but does Angie really need to have Shiloh sharing clothes with her brothers? Hopefully we won't be seeing Maddox in one of Shiloh's dresses any time soon."
Cross-dressing? Are you f-ing kidding me?! What pisses me off even more is that Angelina is being blamed for her wardrobe. Anyone with a 3 year old knows, children are more than capable of choosing their own clothes at that age and most parents also know that it is almost impossible to force a 3 year old child to wear something that they don't want to wear.
Life and Style you should be bloody ashamed of yourselves.
2 comments:
How is criticizing Suri Cruise different from criticizing Shiloh? Seems like the other side of the coin to me.
god this sounds so disgustingly sexist. It's fine for suri to dress up in heels at 3/4[?], but as soon as shiloh dresses mildly masculine everyone's in a furore and its obviously Angelina's fault because there is no way Brad dressed her... or god forbid her parents didn't care what she wore and she picked herself. What kind of society do we live in? I thought this was the 21st century not the 15th.
Post a Comment